#Silverstack vs shotput full

not having SDK ready or using some exclusivity time). It's good idea, they just didn't put enough thinking and work into it (eg. Atoms (from obvious reasons) wanted to give universal RAW format which different camera manufactures could use. If anything then format which won't let you access RAW data could be called 'RAW on paper only'.Īlso based on an assumption it was originally Atomos' idea to create ProResRAW not Apple's. It's not a crap repeated through internet based on nothing. I'm based on facts- details from developers who have access to ProRes RAW SDK (BRAW is publicly accessible so no problem here although still no one confirmed if you can access RAW data or not). You have no way to access RAW data (maybe there is a way in BRAW, not in RED) and have to accept de-nosing which is enforced on you by BM. It's the same as Cineform RAW- open (well SDK is not public).īRAW (or RED) is actually 'black box' which provides final debayered end data which you just pass to your app. Not sure what else you want to know as there is nothing hidden or special there. bypass Apple's own debayering provided in SDK. It's real RAW data which you can do whatever you want, g. ProRes RAW is just plain RAW compressed with ProRes 'scheme'. It's about the same as BM info about BRAW, which actually causes more debates ( specially partially debayered part without any details etc.). What marketing crap? Apple's white paper is very plain and simple, but has no special marketing crap. ProResRAW is a lot, but it's not RAW as in flexible, exporting all the pixels, etc.

#Silverstack vs shotput full

how great it is, no technical details or objective image quality comparisons what so ever, it's the marketing BS at full speed (isn't that what Apple is all about!)

MishaEngel wrote:In the ProResRAW whitepaper, it's only blabla.